Twitter的分布式自增ID算法snowflake|Twitter的分布式自增ID算法snowflake (Java版)

概述
分布式系统中,有一些需要使用全局唯一ID的场景,这种时候为了防止ID冲突可以使用36位的UUID,但是UUID有一些缺点,首先他相对比较长,另外UUID一般是无序的。而且在内部系统中不是很好读。有些时候我们希望能使用一种简单一些的ID,并且希望ID能够按照时间有序生成。而twitter的snowflake解决了这种需求,最初Twitter把存储系统从MySQL迁移到Cassandra,因为Cassandra没有顺序ID生成机制,所以开发了这样一套全局唯一ID生成服务。

Twitter的分布式自增ID算法snowflake|Twitter的分布式自增ID算法snowflake (Java版)
文章图片
image.png
直接上代码

import java.net.NetworkInterface; import java.net.SocketException; import java.net.UnknownHostException; import java.util.Enumeration; import java.util.Random; import java.util.concurrent.ThreadLocalRandom; public class SnowflakeIDGenerator {private static Logger log = LoggerFactory.getLogger(SnowflakeIDGenerator.class); /** * 标尺时间 * 2018-10-01 12:00:00 * 时间戳在64bits总所占位数: 41bits * 最大时间戳的最大范围[0, 2199023255551] * 从标尺时间开始,2199023255551毫秒(69.73057年)之后此ID生成器将失效 */ private final long twepoch = 1538366400000L; /** * 数据中心在64bits中所占的位数: 10bits */ private final long dataCenterIdBits = 10L; /** * 序列在64bits中所占的位数: 12bits */ private final long sequenceBits = 12L; /** * 数据中心最大的范围 [0, 1023] */ private final long maxDataCenterId = -1L ^ (-1L << dataCenterIdBits); /** * 数据中心左移偏移量: 12bits */ private final long dataCenterIdShift = sequenceBits; /** * 时间戳左移偏移量:12+10=22bits */ private final long timestampLeftShift = sequenceBits + dataCenterIdBits; /** * 序列mask * 00000000 00000000 00000000 0000000 00000000 00000000 00001111 11111111 */ private final long sequenceMask = -1L ^ (-1L << sequenceBits); /** * 数据中心ID */ private long dataCenterId; /** * 原始算法默认从0开始, 改进方法:初始化时,随机取[0,1]其中一个 * 毫秒内累计的规则: * 从0开始累积: 0,1,2,3,4...4095 * 从1开始累积: 1,2,3,4,5...4095 * 此字段涉及多线程并发写场景 设置volatile保障happens-before 让写立刻对其他线程可见 */ private volatile long sequence = ThreadLocalRandom.current().nextInt(2); /** * 上次生成ID的时间截 * 此字段涉及多线程并发写场景 设置volatile保障happens-before 让写立刻对其他线程可见 */ private volatile long lastTimestamp = -1L; /** * @param dataCenterId 数据中心ID范围 [0, 1023] */ public SnowflakeIDGenerator(long dataCenterId) { if (dataCenterId == 0) { try { this.dataCenterId = getDataCenterId(); } catch (SocketException | UnknownHostException | NullPointerException e) { this.dataCenterId = ThreadLocalRandom.current().nextInt((int) maxDataCenterId) + 1; log.warn("SNOWFLAKE: could not determine machine address; using random dataCenterId:{}", this.dataCenterId); } } else { this.dataCenterId = dataCenterId; } if (this.dataCenterId > maxDataCenterId || dataCenterId < 0) { this.dataCenterId = ThreadLocalRandom.current().nextInt((int) maxDataCenterId) + 1; log.warn("SNOWFLAKE: dataCenterId > maxDataCenterId; using random dataCenterId:{}", this.dataCenterId); } log.info("SNOWFLAKE: initialised with dataCenterId:{}, sequence:{}", this.dataCenterId, this.sequence); }/** * 阻塞到下一个毫秒,直到获得新的时间戳 * * @param lastTimestamp 上次生成ID的时间截 * @return 当前时间戳 */ protected long tilNextMillis(long lastTimestamp) { long timestamp = System.currentTimeMillis(); while (timestamp <= lastTimestamp) { timestamp = System.currentTimeMillis(); } return timestamp; }protected long getDataCenterId() throws SocketException, UnknownHostException { NetworkInterface network = null; Enumeration en = NetworkInterface.getNetworkInterfaces(); while (en.hasMoreElements()) { NetworkInterface nint = en.nextElement(); if (!nint.isLoopback() && nint.getHardwareAddress() != null) { network = nint; break; } }byte[] mac = network.getHardwareAddress(); Random rnd = new Random(); byte rndByte = (byte) (rnd.nextInt() & 0x000000FF); // take the last byte of the MAC address and a random byte as datacenter ID return ((0x000000FF & (long) mac[mac.length - 1]) | (0x0000FF00 & (((long) rndByte) << 8))) >> 6; }/** * Return the next unique id for the type with the given name using the generator's id generation strategy. * * @return */ public synchronized long getId() {// 当前系统时间戳:毫秒 long timestamp = System.currentTimeMillis(); // 如果当前时间小于上一次ID生成时的时间戳,说明系统时钟回退过这个时候应当抛出异常 // 此处采取激进策略:强制线程睡眠 如果是高并发情况下会在此处形成线程在getId方法上排队等待获取锁现象 if (timestamp < lastTimestamp) { log.warn("Clock moved backwards. Refusing to generate id for {} milliseconds.", (lastTimestamp - timestamp)); try { Thread.sleep((lastTimestamp - timestamp)); } catch (InterruptedException e) { throw new IllegalStateException("系统时钟发生倒退,线程:[" + Thread.currentThread().getName() + "在等待时钟恢复时被终止", e); } }// 如果是同一时间生成的(同一毫秒内), 则进行毫秒内序列 // 这种情况只有在极高并发的情况下才会出现: 当前线程和上一个线程 或者是同一个线程前后两次获取本对象实例的锁 if (lastTimestamp == timestamp) { // sequence累加并用sequenceMask防止溢出 sequence = (sequence + 1) & sequenceMask; // 毫秒内序列溢出,超过4095则归0 if (sequence == 0) { // 阻塞到下一个毫秒,获得新的时间戳 timestamp = tilNextMillis(lastTimestamp); } } else { sequence = ThreadLocalRandom.current().nextInt(2); }// 上次生成ID的时间截 lastTimestamp = timestamp; // 移位并通过或运算拼到一起组成64位的ID long id = ((timestamp - twepoch) << timestampLeftShift) | (dataCenterId << dataCenterIdShift) | sequence; if (id < 0) { log.warn("ID is smaller than 0: {}", id); }return id; } }

https://www.cnblogs.com/lirenzuo/p/8440413.html
【Twitter的分布式自增ID算法snowflake|Twitter的分布式自增ID算法snowflake (Java版)】http://www.cnblogs.com/haoxinyue/p/5208136.html

    推荐阅读